What to say about the budget?
Posted on Friday, June 25, 2010 at 6:18am
6 responses
IT’S taken some time for me to comment on the ConDem government’s budget as I’ve been busy this week, and I was ill on Wednesday. Better now – thanks for asking!
My first thought was that the recession gave us a year-zero opportunity to look at the future of the Welsh economy, and to ask what we can do to prevent us from ever having to suffer the effects of financial mismanagement in the markets in the future. Instead, the Budget reads like a short term response – a five-year plan at the very most. But we need to put in place medium and long-term solutions to very fundamental problems at the heart of our economy.
It will be interesting to see the VAT increase play itself out. After all, you need consumers spending to stimulate the economy back to growth, and this rise is bound to dissuade buying. We are carrying out an inquiry in to financial inclusion on the Assembly’s Communities and Culture committee at the moment, and Fran Targett from Citizens Advice Cymru yesterday told the committee that the VAT rise and the decrease in housing benefit “don’t pull together”, and are “dangerous” for those on lower incomes. I cannot but agree.
Similarly, with the balance of spending cuts being 77% to 23% in tax rises, we will see more job losses, without a doubt. Unison estimates that every job lost costs the British taxpayer £16,000. That will have to be met, but where exactly is that costed?
The new rules on housing benefits are a misnomer. It betrays a Tory government as in thrall to Daily Mail headlines – of non-contributors living high on the benefits hog – as the last Labour government. If these stories are true, then they are not the common experience.
The banking levy is little more than a headline. Barclays made record £11bn in profits last year, so there is a strong possibility that it could have met the levy’s target itself in Corporation Tax. This is just a drop in the ocean. Where was the reform of inheritance tax, and the creation of a ‘wealth tax’?
The public sector pay freeze will affect Wales without a doubt. Apart from non-devolved departments like the police, the DVLA in Swansea, the Office for National Statistics in Newport and Companies House in Cardiff, the rest of the public sector won’t know what’s available until the CSR in October. So Welsh workers have been left in limbo for the summer.
And while we’re on the public sector, we shouldn’t let the Labour party off the hook here. At the moment, you could swear that they have been in opposition for 13 years. Let’s get real – they did little to redress the balance between rich and poor when they were in Government on a UK level. Its true to say that Wales has lost its coal industry, and it’s lost most of its steel industry. Manufacturing as a proportion of Welsh GDP fell 10% during Labour’s tenure, and it was Labour that grew the public sector. So it is grossly unfair of the Tories to depict men and women whose only crime is to go to work as part of an industry that is ‘bloated’ and therefore unnecessary.
If there’s anything good about the budget it’s that it has restored the link between earnings and pensions and that there is still a universal right to child benefit, although it has been frozen. But I still don’t see why the public sector should face all the worst cuts alone. The banking system must be laughing at how well it has done from this budget.
There are other alternatives that were not looked in to by the UK government. Tax evasion accounts for £70 billion, while tax avoidance stands at £25bn. Some £28bn of this isn’t collected as HM revenue doesn’t have the resources so it seems, and of this £11bn has been written off. Yes, there was a one-year freeze on the civil list, but Osborne is looking at providing a grant later on in the year. Hardly making the royals suffer the squeeze.
I worry what will happen in Wales, and the cuts that the Welsh Government must make. I worry how these measures will affect Welsh families – those families who are already in poverty, and people that will be pushed in to poverty by no fault of their own. I don’t want to scaremonger, I know Wales must play it’s part in this agenda, but this short term thinking by the ConDem government hasn’t inspired me one bit.












not happy with the budget. bbc website had this on it:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/10373060.stm
i tried sliding the things around and managed to get the no required without raising vat, as shown below:
https://docs.google.com/document/edit?id=11BzhymKtJytXqdxd3B7al1QzGu2e1fiU3rFv_COyiRA&hl=en&authkey=CMb9wgg&pli=1
Granted, its probably not that simple in reality, but shows they didnt have to raise vat.
Bethan
You don’t mention anything about the changes to DLA which is going to affect many thousands of chronically ill and disabled people in Wales. Let alone the many thousands of Carers who look after them.
Because if DLA is taken away or reduced, Cares will have their Carers Allowance taken away, also the possibility will be, that they will not then be classed as Carers. Two benefit problems solved with one stroke, pardon the pun.
It seems to be bandied about and official speak seems to encourage it. If what Danny Alexander said is anything to go by.
That DLA is a work related benefit, because, he said, the claimants will be assessed in the same way as the ESA test.
The ESA is a work related benefit.
DLA is a benefit which has to be fought hard for (you have to provide the evidence, have you ever tried to prove a negative) because you are found to ‘need help with your day to day needs through chronic illness or disability‘. This money is then awarded to help the person with the extra help needed through each and every day.
How can they compare the two as being assessed in the same way.
A couple of links to show the deceit of the London Governments and Ministers who don’t read their own cabinet reports or don’t want to.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/ouch/messageboards/F2322273?thread=7595089
http://www.bbc.co.uk/ouch/messageboards/F2322273?thread=7592434
thanks Roger, I should have mentioned DLA. Rhydian James from Plaid Cymru in North Wales has written an excellent article for comment is free on the guardian website on DLA.
Bethan.
Thank you for pointing Rhydians article out to me. It is the most appt and comprehensive description of what it is like for disabled or chronically ill people I have read so far.
If only we had more articulate people able to really describe the situation. It would make people sit up and take notice and not believe the deliberate falsehoods that are portrayed.
But there again do they want to. It is convenient to have a scapegoat.
The Tories have said they want to do more for HM Forces and Veterans. Well, if the government cuts the DLA, this will most certainly affect those Veterans; who do not qualify for WPMS, on mobility allowance; higher rate, therefore many veterans and those who qualify for the Motability Scheme with debts upwards of £7,000 – £10,000. How? Because when people sign up to the Motability Scheme they have a contract for 3 years on contract hire, which will not stop just because someone’s allowance has stopped, the person who the car is lease too will be liable for the full term of the contract, furthermore, if a person has chosen the hire purchase scheme, they could end up with a 5 year contract to meet. Now the spin from Cameron and Clegg is just a pack of lies, when they say they want to do more for Veterans and the poor. More likely, they want to protect their Eton and private school buddies in the banking sector by making the poor pay. Now remind me who got us in this mess in the first place.
For those who have cars on the motability scheme at the Total Allowance of DLA should see no difference if they still qualify after medical re-assemssment or reduced, however, those on say an allowance of £49.85, will still have to pay this amount even if the DLA moility allowance is reduced.
The War Pensions Motability Scheme should not be affected!