Bethan Jenkins AC/AM Blog

I indicated yesterday that I would do a blog post on student fees and the meeting of Plaid’s National Council where there were two motions on the issue- one by Plaid’s Westminster group advocating to maintain the current policy, and one by Plaid’s Government Ministers stating that the Government would be likely to remove the Tuition Fee Grant, and to call on Plaid’s Director of Policy to bring forward a new package of proposals to provide sustainable support for students. Members voted in favour of the Westminster group motion which was to sustain current party policy in opposition to top-up fees, with an amendment to pospone any changes to the policy until after the 2011 Assembly election.

We had a passionate debate about the issue, with members outlining their stance on the policy in question. I understand that our Ministers are in a difficult position, and that the education portfolio lies outside Plaid’s Ministerial responsibilities. I acknowledge the difficult position they are in. However for many members, this debate was about whether or not we as a party were willing to endorse the further marketisation of Higher Education, and our willingness to brake a clear manifesto election pledge.

Following the proceedings on Saturday I will be voting in line with party policy should it come to a vote on this matter in the Assembly. National Council voted to sustain our stance, therefore I can be confident that I am listening to the will of the members and acting in accordance with the expressed will of Plaid membership.

I was not present in the meeting when Ieuan made a statement on the way forward for the Ministers in relation to the proceedings of National Council, so I cannot tell you my reaction in that regard.Nevertheless, it is clear to all what our party policy is. Make of that what you wish.