Gweithio'n galed ar ran pobl Gorllewin De Cymru / Working hard for the people of South Wales West

Archive for 2007

Hain the ‘devolutionist’.

Peter Hain has just addressed the Assembly, but fear not, I am not live blogging. It was far too lively a debate to miss out on! I wanted to intervene to voice my concerns on the sale of student loans bill, and the problems that may arise if a private company chooses to change the rules and regulations with regards the loans system in the future. Nevertheless, I did not get the chance amongst all the ya boo politics, which I’m sure was a sign of comfort to Hain as that is what he is used to at Westminster!

The point of interest for me was Hain’s reference to a referendum on a Parliament for Wales. He described himself as a ‘devolutionist‘, yet when it came to making moves to supporting a referendum as agreed between Labour and Plaid, he fell short of supporting it outright- going back on his argument that we need firm public support and cross party support before we can even consider holding a referendum.

Ok, so he doesn’t want to be reminded of how we lost the referendum in ’79, but times have changed and I don’t quite think that he’s amended his opinion to coincide with that sea change in Welsh opinion, both in favour of a referendum and to the concept of a Parliament for Wales.

We need a much firmer declaration of support from Hain if this referendum is to happen, let alone win it. He may be appeasing those in his party who are opposed to the referendum at this point- namely those MP’s who now have little better to do than to talk about putting a Welsh dragon on the British flag! But we can’t sit around waiting for them to feel better about the situation. The Convention is happening, and as far as the One Wales agreement goes, the referendum is too.

Now all we need to know is whether Hain and co. will ever be won over by the need to take this a step further, and create a proper Parliament for Wales. To have to go cap in hand to Hain in the first place is more than I can take- for him to sit on the fence like he is doing presently is unacceptable.

First Minister’s questions- Child Poverty

Bethan Jenkins: Do you have any knowledge of whether the child poverty implementation plan that was constructed in November 2006 will be carried through to this Assembly? At several meetings with representatives of Save the Children Wales, they expressed their concern about this strategy and whether the Assembly will receive a report on the implementation plan?

The First Minister: Yes, I believe it to be the case. You tend to get overly concerned about the names of particular implementation plans, but the broad thrust of having a strategy to eradicate child poverty by 2020 is an absolutely solid commitment of the One Wales administration.

………………………………………………………….

Bethan Jenkins: A wyddoch o gwbl a gaiff y cynllun gweithredu ar dlodi plant a luniwyd ym mis Tachwedd 2006 ei gario drwodd i’r Cynulliad hwn? Mewn sawl cyfarfod gyda chynrychiolwyr Achub y Plant (Cymru), mynegasant eu pryder ynghylch y strategaeth hon ac a fydd y Cynulliad yn cael adroddiad ar y cynllun gweithredu?

Y Prif Weinidog: Bydd, credaf fod hynny’n wir. Yr ydych yn tueddu i bryderu’n ormodol am enwau cynlluniau gweithredu arbennig, ond mae byrdwn cyffredinol cael strategaeth i ddiddymu tlodi plant erbyn 2020 yn ymrwymiad cwbl gadarn gan weinyddiaeth Cymru’n Un

Senedd debate- young people with disabilities

Responding to Equal Opportunities Committee Report on Service Provision for young people with disabilities.

Bethan Jenkins: Thank you for the report. I just wanted to mention that Stephen Dyer, Amy Barrett and Daniel Beynon, members of the reference group that helped to shape today’s report, are present here today, and they want a reassurance from the Minister that the voices of young people, especially young disabled people, will continue to be heard. Disabled children must have the same access to services as other children in Wales have. Lots of disabled people are now involved in organisations such as Funky Dragon, but I believe that such organisations should carry more weight in political decision-making. I would like to echo their representations and ensure that their voices are heard strongly and clearly today.

Jane Hutt: You are very much a champion for young people, and I welcome them here today. We had a robust and challenging session with Funky Dragon on Thursday, and many Assembly Members—and, most importantly, Ministers—were put on the spot and questioned and scrutinised. I was pleased that we were able to find funding last year, when Jane Davidson was the Minister for education, to support the network of young disabled people in Wales, which had done some pioneering work following the big international conference that it organised in Swansea. Young disabled people will steer us through the conference later this week, and will certainly be at the forefront of scrutiny, challenging how the Government responds to this important report. Diolch yn fawr.

…………………………………………………………

Bethan Jenkins: Diolch ichi am yr adroddiad. Yr oeddwn am ddweud bod Stephen Dyer, Amy Barrett a Daniel Beynon, aelodau o’r grŵp cyfeirio a roddodd help imi lunio’r adroddiad hwn heddiw, yma heddiw, ac maent am gael sicrwydd gan y Gweinidog y bydd llais pobl ifanc, yn arbennig pobl ifanc anabl, yn parhau i gael ei glywed. Rhaid i blant anabl gael yr un mynediad i wasanaethau â phlant eraill yng Nghymru. Mae llawer o bobl anabl yn ymwneud â sefydliadau fel y Ddraig Ffynci erbyn hyn, ond credaf y dylai sefydliadau o’r fath gael mwy o ddylanwad ar benderfyniadau gwleidyddol. Hoffwn ategu eu sylwadau a sicrhau bod eu lleisiau’n cael eu clywed yn gryf ac yn glir yma heddiw.

Jane Hutt: Yr ydych yn sicr yn lladmerydd o blaid pobl ifanc, ac fe’u croesawaf yma heddiw. Cawsom sesiwn rymus a heriol gyda’r Ddraig Ffynci ddydd Iau, a rhoddwyd sawl Aelod o’r Cynulliad—ac, yn bwysicach na hynny, Weinidogion—mewn picil a chawsant eu holi a’u rhoi drwy broses graffu. Yr oeddwn yn falch ein bod wedi llwyddo i ddod i hyd i arian y llynedd, pan oedd Jane Davidson yn Weinidog dros addysg, i gefnogi’r rhwydwaith o bobl ifanc anabl yng Nghymru, a oedd wedi gwneud gwaith arloesol yn dilyn y gynhadledd ryngwladol fawr a drefnodd yn Abertawe. Bydd pobl ifanc anabl yn ein tywys drwy’r gynhadledd yn ddiweddarach yr wythnos hon, a byddant yn sicr ar flaen y gad o ran y broses graffu, gan herio’r ffordd y mae’r Llywodraeth yn ymateb i’r adroddiad pwysig hwn. Diolch yn fawr.

Question on the deportation case of Venera Aliyeva

Bethan Jenkins- I wish to raise the pressing issue of three constituents of mine from Swansea, Venera Aliyeva, and her children, Anna and Murat Memedov, who are being detained in a centre in Bedfordshire. They will be sent back to Azerbaijan, and they are in fear of their life. Could we make any representations to Westminster on this issue, to show that we are in support of retaining them in this country?

Carwyn Jones- Forgive me for not commenting on the specific case that you raise, as I do not know the full details. However, you raise an important point: people who are living in this country, and who face the threat of deportation should have full access to the law and to financial support to enable them to pursue their case. That is the mark of a civilised society. We have always had people moving to our shores from elsewhere. We are—to quote the First Minister—an island of immigrants; it is simply a question of when we arrived here. We sometimes forget that. I agree with the suggestion that, where we have what seems to be a difficult situation, people should have full access to justice so that their cases may be heard.

…………………………………………………….

Bethan Jenkins-
hoffwn godi mater brys yn ymwneud â thri o’m hetholwyr o Abertawe sy’n cael eu cadw mewn canolfan yn Swydd Bedford, sef Venera Aliyeva, a’i phlant, Anna a Murat Memedov. Byddant yn cael eu hanfon yn ôl i Azerbaijan, ac maent yn ofni bod eu bywydau mewn perygl. A fyddai modd inni gyflwyno unrhyw sylwadau ynglŷn â hynny i San Steffan, er mwyn dangos ein bod o blaid eu cadw yn y wlad hon?

Carwyn Jones-
Maddeuwch imi am beidio â gwneud sylwadau ynglŷn â’r achos penodol y cyfeiriwch ato, gan nad wyf yn gwybod y manylion yn llawn. Fodd bynnag, yr ydych yn codi pwynt pwysig: dylai pobl sy’n byw yn y wlad hon, ac sy’n wynebu’r bygythiad o gael eu hanfon o’r wlad gael mynediad llawn at y gyfraith ac at gymorth ariannol i’w galluogi i ddadlau eu hachos. Mae hynny’n arwydd o gymdeithas waraidd. Mae pobl wastad wedi bod yn dod i’n glannau o leoedd eraill. Yr ydym—a dyfynnu’r Prif Weinidog—yn ynys o fewnfudwyr; yr unig wahaniaeth yw pa bryd y cyraeddasom yma. Yr ydym yn anghofio hynny weithiau. Yr wyf yn cytuno â’r awgrym, lle mae gennym sefyllfa sy’n ymddangos yn un anodd, y dylai pobl gael mynediad llawn at gyfiawnder fel bod modd i’w hachosion gael eu clywed.

Question to Business Minister on Swansea Shared Service Centre

My second question is on Swansea’s shared services. There has been a declaration to save some of the Remploy factories, but there has not been any sort of announcement on the retention of the Swansea shared service centre. The staff at the centre are concerned that Anne McGuire, the Westminster MP, who is responsible for this, continues to say that the centre will be moved to Leeds. Could the Government make further representations to Anne McGuire, and ask why this decision has been made prior to the consultation process ending, given that it should rest with Peter Hain?

Carwyn Jones: Your points on shared services will be on the record. Those points can be made to Anne McGuire

…………………………………………………………….

Mae fy ail gwestiwn yn ymwneud â gwasanaethau a rennir yn Abertawe. Cafwyd datganiad yn ymwneud ag achub rhai o’r ffatrïoedd Remploy, ond ni chafwyd unrhyw fath o gyhoeddiad ynglŷn â chadw’r ganolfan gwasanaethau a rennir yn Abertawe. Mae staff y ganolfan yn poeni y bydd Anne McGuire, yr AS yn San Steffan, sy’n gyfrifol am hyn, yn dal i ddweud y bydd y ganolfan yn cael ei symud i Leeds. A fyddai modd i’r Llywodraeth gyflwyno mwy o sylwadau i Anne McGuire, a gofyn pam y gwnaethpwyd y penderfyniad hwn cyn i’r broses ymgynghori ddod i ben, gan gymryd mai Peter Hain a ddylai gael y gair olaf?

Carwyn Jones: Bydd eich pwyntiau ynglŷn â gwasanaethau a rennir yn cael eu cofnodi. Gellir cyflwyno’r pwyntiau hynny i Anne McGuire.

Question on Eating Disorders to Edwina Hart

Bethan Jenkins: You just mentioned eating disorders, which is an issue that greatly interests me. A few months ago I spoke about Ali Valenzuela from Swansea, who could not get access to services. Another of my constituents, from Porthcawl, had a consultation set up in the Princess of Wales Hospital but it was cancelled. She has had to go the Priory in Bristol. I urge you to look into this urgently to see what we can set up in Wales. We are trying to establish u an all-party group on eating disorders in the Assembly, but urgent action needs to be taken because so many people are going to England for services that should be provided in Wales.

Edwina Hart: I have discussed this with officials and have been trying to look for the necessary funds to be made available to start to provide an adequate service in Wales. Health Commission Wales has authorised quite a lot of treatment for individuals in the Priory in Bristol and elsewhere, but the issue is what happens when they come out of the Priory and what local services are available to them. Assembly Members have raised several cases with me. The response to one, which was to attend an arts class once a week, is not the response that I would expect at a local level. People need support groups and assistance. They need to address the whole issue of how they feel about their body and their life, and we certainly do not have all those services in place across Wales. I will aim, during the course of the next three years, budget permitting, to prioritise these issues.

……………………………………….

Bethan Jenkins: Yr ydych newydd grybwyll anhwylderau bwyta—mater sydd o ddiddordeb mawr imi. Ychydig fisoedd yn ôl soniais am Ali Valenzuela o Abertawe, na allai gael mynediad at wasanaethau. Trefnwyd ymgynghoriad ar gyfer un arall o’m hetholwyr o Borthcawl yn Ysbyty Tywysoges Cymru, ond diddymwyd yr ymgynghoriad hwnnw. Mae wedi gorfod mynd i’r Priory ym Mryste. Fe’ch anogaf i edrych ar hyn ar fyrder i weld beth y gallwn ei sefydlu yng Nghymru. Yr ydym yn ceisio sefydlu grŵp hollbleidiol yn y Cynulliad ar anhwylderau bwyta, ond mae angen cymryd camau brys oherwydd bod cynifer o bobl yn mynd i Loegr er mwyn cael gwasanaethau y dylid eu darparu yng Nghymru.

Edwina Hart: Yr wyf wedi trafod hyn gyda swyddogion ac wedi bod yn ceisio chwilio am y cyllid angenrheidiol er mwyn gallu darparu gwasanaeth digonol yng Nghymru. Mae Comisiwn Iechyd Cymru wedi awdurdodi cryn dipyn o driniaethau i unigolion yn y Priory ym Mryste ac mewn lleoedd eraill, ond yr hyn sy’n digwydd pan ddeuant o’r Priory a pha wasanaethau lleol sydd ar gael iddynt yw’r broblem. Mae Aelodau’r Cynulliad wedi codi sawl achos â mi. Nid yw’r ateb i un, sef mynd i ddosbarth celf unwaith yr wythnos, yn ateb y byddwn yn ei ddisgwyl ar lefel leol. Mae angen grwpiau cefnogi a chymorth ar bobl. Mae angen iddynt fynd i’r afael â’r modd y maent yn teimlo ynghylch eu corff a’u bywyd yn gyfan gwbl, ac yn bendant, nid yw’r holl wasanaethau hynny ar waith gennym ym mhob cwr o Gymru. Os bydd y gyllideb yn caniatáu hynny, byddaf yn anelu at roi blaenoriaeth i’r materion hyn yn ystod y tair blynedd nesaf.

Guest blogger # 4 Graham Smith- Republic

CHALLENGES AHEAD FOR THE MONARCHY

Graham Smith is the Campaign Manager for the organisation ‘Republic’. To find out more go to their website www.republic.org.uk or email Graham on g.smith@republic.org.uk.

“It’s time” is a well-worn political slogan, but for Republic it says it all. The monarchy is well past its use-by date: a feudal and unaccountable institution in a modern, democratic age. Now, as a number of developments converge to create a unique, once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for republicanism, Republic is gearing up for a major new campaign.

In many ways the intellectual arguments have already been won – few politicians and commentators seriously defend the principle of hereditary public office, as we have seen in the House of Lords debate. The British monarchy has largely survived the tectonic cultural and political shifts of the last sixty years because of political inertia and self-interest – and a residual sense of deference that runs throughout our society. This has, in no small way, been helped by the longevity of the reign of Elizabeth II, a monarch who enjoys high levels of personal support and affection and who, rightly or wrongly, is regarded as having ‘never put a foot wrong’.

However, things are about to change. The monarchy faces a number of challenges over the next few years, some of which will only get more acute as time passes. These challenges will present Republic with unique opportunities to push for the abolition of this absurd institution.

Firstly, the Queen is 81 and is now in the twilight of her reign. Given that the popularity of the monarchy rests on a widespread affection for the Queen it is likely that as the issue of the succession comes into sharper focus more and more questions will be asked about the institution’s future. This debate will be heightened by the much less popular prospect of Charles becoming King. With routine criticism of Charles, William and Harry in the press, it is clear the automatic respect the royals once enjoyed is evaporating fast. And of course, this will be the first succession since the end of universal deference, and the first since the advent of a more ruthless, 24-hour news media. It is inconceivable that this succession will be like any that have gone before. And this debate will not wait until the inevitable happens – it will start soon and grow louder with every passing year. Republic will be pushing that debate forward, pushing for change before the succession becomes a reality.

Looking to the Commonwealth, Australia now has a republican Prime Minister. Opinion polls for the past twelve months have all pointed to a Labor Party election victory in Australia, and it has now become a reality. The Labor Party is led by Kevin Rudd, a committed republican who has promised a second referendum on the issue of an Australian republic. This suggests that the debate will be in full swing in Australia within two to three years, with a possible referendum within three to six years. It is very likely that New Zealand and Canada will follow suit, judging from recent opinion polls. Such developments will cause a major debate back here in the UK – and will give strength to our own cause. Republic will be raising the simple question time and again – if Australia can choose their own head of state, why not us?

Back home in the UK, our own constitution is now a topic of mainstream political debate. Britain’s constitutional settlement is up for grabs, with all political parties now advocating change. The case has already been made against hereditary public office, during the Lords debate. Questions have already been raised about how all this change may affect or threaten the position of the monarchy. Root and branch reform is being proposed by some, while the Prime Minister is now advocating a written constitution. This all means two things: firstly the Pandora’s Box of constitutional reform will be open, and as the debate moves forward numerous opportunities will arise to press the point that we should be able to choose our own head of state. Secondly, as many other constitutional issues are settled during this process of reform, such as electing the upper house or writing our constitution, it will leave the monarchy as the last piece of unfinished business. This issue will begin to attract more and more attention from a wider array of constitutional reformers.

As these developments unfold, Republic will be pushing ahead with major new campaigning initiatives, geared to generating a higher level of public debate about the future of the monarchy. For us the case is clear – in the 21st century, in an age of democratic accountability and constitutional reform, Britain should rid itself of a feudal and anti-democratic institution. This is an important issue – the monarchy is an institution which lies at the heart of our constitution and it is an institution which cannot be defended by serious argument. It has no place in modern society and it must go. We believe the next few years will be our best opportunity yet to make this case loud and clear – and to move Britain toward a republican and truly democratic future.

Sustrans Cymru/ Wales

Voting for the Big Lottery’s £50 million has started. Please log on to www.thepeoples50million.org.uk and vote for Sustrans’ Connect2 project, and get your friends, family and colleagues to do the same. As well as getting people to exercise more, Connect2 will take practical action to tackle climate change and reduce congestion.

The project is made up of 79 schemes across the UK – nine of which are in Wales.In Carmarthen, Clydach, Port Talbot, Merthyr, Pontypridd, Newport, Monmouth, Cardiff and Rhyl we want to tackle the obstacles presented by busy roads, railways or rivers which prevent people from walking and cycling for everyday journeys – to the shops, school, work etc. We face tough competition from three projects across England and need your help to create a healthier more sustainable future: just a minute of your time could make all the difference. Internet voting starts today and closes at 12 noon on Monday 10 December.

There’s also be a telephone vote on ITV1 on the weekend of December 7th, with the results expected on the 12th.
……………………………………………………………………..

Mae’r pleidleisio ar gyfer £50 miliwn Y Loteri Fawr wedi dechrau.

Ewch i www.thepeoples50million.org.uk a phleidleisiwch dros brosiect Connect2 Sustrans, a gwnewch yn siŵr bod eich teulu, eich ffrindiau a’ch cydweithwyr yn gwneud hynny hefyd.Yn ogystal â chael pobl i wneud mwy o ymarfer corff, bydd Connect2 yn cymryd camau ymarferol i fynd i’r afael â newid hinsawdd a lleihau tagfeydd traffig.

Mae’r prosiect yn cynnwys 79 cynllun ledled y DU – gyda naw ohonynt yng Nghymru.Yng Nghaerfyrddin, Clydach, Port Talbot, Merthyr, Pontypridd, Casnewydd, Trefynwy, Caerdydd a’r Rhyl rydym am fynd i’r afael â’r rhwystrau a grëir gan ffyrdd prysur, rheilffyrdd neu afonydd sy’n rhwystro pobl rhag cerdded a beicio ar gyfer siwrneiau bob dydd – i’r siopau, i’r ysgol, i’r gwaith ac ati.Rydym yn wynebu cystadleuaeth gref gan dri phrosiect o wahanol rannau o Loegr ac rydym angen eich cymorth i greu dyfodol mwy iachus a chynaliadwy: gallai munud o’ch amser wneud gwahaniaeth.Mae pleidleisio ar y rhyngrwyd yn dechrau heddiw ac yn cau am 12 canol dydd ar ddydd Llun 10 Rhagfyr.

Bydd yna hefyd bleidlais ffôn ar ITV1 ar benwythnos y 7fed o Ragfyr, gyda’r canlyniadau i’w disgwyl ar y 12fed.

……………………………………………………………..

Vote now online for Sustrans’ Connect2 at www.thepeoples50million.org.uk. We need your vote to win 50 million pounds for walking and cycling. Phone voting from landlines and mobiles begins on 7 December – please text ‘Connect2′ to 80010 or complete the form at www.sustransconnect2.org.uk if you would like to be sent the number to vote.

who would join a political party?

Due to problems with the Assembly server I won’t be able to do my guest blogger section this week, so it will restart after the weekend if the IT is working again at the Assembly.

I was going to write a letter to the Western Mail and local papers in response to Ray Davies, a Caerphilly Councillor’s recent criticism of Plaid for entering the House of Lords, but Dafydd Iwan got in there first!

I know Ray well, and was probably just as surprised as Dafydd Iwan to read the somewhat angry letter in the papers this week from Ray. If he was a Plaid member, then I could totally understand his resentment for our change in policy, but for someone who has remained in the Labour party as an anti war activist over the years, who has had to defend his party’s involvement in Iraq and so on, I find it quite perplexing that he has responded in such a manner.

Before I was a member of any political party, and when I invited Ray to speak at Aberystwyth Guild of Students as part of activities surrounding the peace movement in Wales, I always asked him why he was a member of a party that he campaigned so much against. His answer was (to generalise) that he wanted to make changes from within, and help in restoring ‘Old Labour’. He was always so clear in that opinion and aim, and didn’t once question his membership to Labour, even when the Labour run Council at Caerphilly had run ins with him over his determination to continue to protest during peace protests using non violent direct action.

Of course, I agree with Ray on the issue of the House of Lords, but that is a decision which party members have taken. Had it been a policy imposed on members, then the discussion would be quite different. If we decide to become members of political parties, and want to remain as such, then sometimes we can’t always get our own way- however much we try! We can obviously campaign against ideas before they become ingrained in policy if we disagree with them vehemently, and we can even choose to leave the party if our principles do not fall in line with the party’s general direction. Nevertheless, Ray must know that there is a broad church of people in every party, and that is how it will always be.

Death of the ID card?

I’ve just been watching Question Time from Scotland and it dawned on me that the programme is much more in touch with the reality of devolution North of the English border than it is in covering Wales-Scottish MSP’s on the show tonight far outweighed the representation of AM’s when the show was in Swansea recently, for example. We’ve had to battle in the past to get any Plaid representation on QT in Wales, and the compromise during the election was that Adam Price MP would appear on the show in Oxford. You guessed right, they didn’t really make Wales the main topic of discussion!

I enjoyed the debate tonight, especially as I think that Nicola Sturgeon is a very talented politician, and succeeded in making meaningful points regarding ID Cards, and of course, Scottish powers. It was a hard night again for Labour given that any representative on this evening’s show would somehow have to react to the crisis in the HMRC at the moment. Wendy Alexander put ‘if I’m honest’ as a caveat to almost everything she said to ensure that she would not have to take responsibility for the matter- unsurprisingly.

The discussion centred on whether a Government Minister should resign over the fact that discs pertaining to personal details from 7 million child benefit files were misplaced, and posted to another department within the Government (this via the company TNT, and not Royal Mail- as I understand from various broadsheet reports) I believe that officials in the HMRC have resigned today, but there are calls for Alistair Darling to resign also.

It did dawn on me that while I was sitting watching Question Time, on another channel, Mclaren was explaining to English football fans why he was sacked as England Manager the day after the team failed to qualify for Euro 2008. In other professions it seems that there is an obligation on those with key responsibilities to resign, to step down if there is an error on their behalf. Nevertheless, in politics, it seems that more often than not, different rules apply. This is probably one of many reasons why people lose faith in the political system.

I don’t advocate that there should be resignations for every small fault, but that where Government does go wrong, there should at least be an acknowledgement of the fault or error made, and actions taken however minute, to restore the public’s faith in our political institutions.

Darling will probably stay in position, but he will have a tough job ahead in selling the concept of ID cards, not that I believed that there was ever a case to advocate it. At least now Nick Clegg won’t have to martyr himself by getting arrested by refusing to carry and ID Card- one less thing for his publicity team to worry about at night I suspect….